Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Deaton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1922No. 6 Div. 460PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

The action is for damages for the death of plaintiff’s (appellee’s) intestate Deaton, who, at the time of his injury, was a motorman in the service of appellant on one of its street railway lines. The case was submitted to the jury on the averments of count 2. This count was drawn to state a cause of action under subdivision 5, Code, § 3910, of our Employers’ Liability Act. The count is a copy of the count (5) expressly approved in B. R. L. & P. Co. v. Mosely, 164 Ala. 111, 119, 120, 51 South. 4£4. Consequent upon the earnest insistence for appellant that the count is defective, particularly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MarkeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. LefanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MothershedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Travis v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Leeth v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. S. H. Kress & Co. v. BarrattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Holley v. JoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API