Legal Opinion

Holuska v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 3, 1970No. 4 Div. 398PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

In this case plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant and from judgment overruling her motion for new trial.

Plaintiff brought suit for damages for personal injuries which she allegedly sustained as a result of an intersectional collision in the City of Opp between her automobile and that of defendant. The case was submitted to a jury on a count in simple negligence. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Judgment was rendered accordingly. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled. Hence this appeal.

Plaintiff contends the trial court committed reversible…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Rosen v. LawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Johnson v. BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Baggett v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Jowers v. DauphinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maslankowski v. Beam Ex Rel. QuernemeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Giles v. GardnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Glaze v. TennysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Ham v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API