Legal Opinion

Enfantino v. United States Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1931No. Docket No. 7490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An appeal by defendants United States Fire Insurance Company and North River Insurance Company from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of #1500.

The complaint alleged that on or about August 25, 1925, in consideration of a premium of $45, defendants issued a policy of insurance upon certain alfalfa hay owned- by plaintiff for a term of six months; that during the policy period, to wit, on January 1, 1926, the hay was totally destroyed by fire. It was further alleged that defendants waived the provisions of the policy requiring notice and proof of loss, and that plaintiff had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Baile v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Solomon v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bank of Anderson v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alta California Regional Center v. Fremont Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Williams v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ruffino v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Insua v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Insua v. Scottsdale InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API