Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1995PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

We granted this appeal to determine whether an indigent defendant in a non-capital ease is entitled to the appointment of an independent psychiatric expert at state expense to assist the defense in trial preparation. Both the trial court and the Court of Criminal Appeals denied the defendant’s request for expert assistance. We conclude that when a defendant in a non-capital case demonstrates to the trial court in an ex parte proceeding that his sanity at the time of the offense is to be a significant factor at trial, the federal constitution, at a minimum,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ruff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. John Paul Seals v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API