Legal Opinion

GERMINO v. Hillyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 2003No. F041268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting instructions to cotrustees; the order is appealable pursuant to Probate Code section 1304, subdivision (a). (All further statutory references are to the Probate Code unless otherwise specified.) We will hold that the trustees’ notice pursuant to section 16061.7 was adequate to commence the limitations period established by section 16061.8. The trial court was correct that this limitations period has expired; therefore we will affirm the order.

Facts and Procedural History

Decedent Vincent L. Hillyer created a living trust, nominally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Oceanside Marina Towers Ass'n v. Oceanside Community Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Harold L. James, Inc. v. Five Points Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Migliore v. Mid-Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Galloway v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. Washington Ornamental Ironworks Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs & Shapiro, LLP v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Meiri v. ShamtoubiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API