Migliore v. Mid-Century Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Appellant, Marie Migliore, appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent Mid-Century Insurance Company based on the statute of limitations. We conclude the trial court did not err and we affirm.
Statement of Facts
At the time of the Northridge earthquake, January 17, 1994, appellant was employed by her father’s business, a Farmer’s Insurance agency doing business as Migliore Insurance Agency. Appellant was head of the automobile insurance department. Appellant’s residence was insured through a Farmer’s entity, Fire Insurance Exchange, but she had no earthquake coverage.
Despit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DOHENY PARK TERRACE HOME-OWNERS ASS'N., INC. v. Truck Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Kapsimallis v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Heighley v. J.C. Penney Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Gaylord v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.