Legal Opinion

Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs & Shapiro, LLP v. Goff

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 2011No. B220639PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTHSCHILD, Acting P. J.

George and Esther Goff appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of the law firm Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs & Shapiro, LLP1 (the Firm), which previously represented the Goffs. The parties submitted a fee dispute to arbitration. The arbitrators issued an award for the Firm in the amount of $654,658.28 plus interest. The Goffs contend that the trial court should have vacated the award because the arbitrators exceeded their powers by ruling that the arbitration was binding. We agree and therefore reverse.

*429BACKGROUND

I. Procedural Summary

On March…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Feitelberg v. Credit Suisse First Boston, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Novak v. FayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Baxter v. BockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API