Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Coopervision, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 22, 1995No. 94-02360PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
661 So.2d 33 (1995)
Julio HERNANDEZ and Lail Finlay, his wife, Appellants,
v.
COOPERVISION, INC., San Jose, California; Coopervision (U.K.) Ltd., South Hampton, England, Appellees.
No. 94-02360.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 22, 1995.
William A. Post, Dunnellon, for appellants.
James B. Thompson and Rebecca Sandefur of The Thompson Law Group, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellees.
LAZZARA, Judge.
The appellants, Julio Hernandez and Lail Findlay, challenge the trial court's order dismissing their second amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- State Ex Rel. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. TrammellSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- 84 Lumber Co. v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- BANKERS v. Av-Med Managed CareDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Hernandez v. Coopervision, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- In Re Estate of FrappierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- State v. WollandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Sucart v. Office of the CommissionerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.