Sucart v. Office of the Commissioner
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLogue, J.
Yuri Sucart and Jose Gustavo Gomez seek writs of certiorari to prevent the plaintiff in the lawsuit below from taking their depositions. They contend that federal law preempts the lawsuit, and therefore the trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to issue the subpoenas. Because the record before us does not clearly establish that the lawsuit is preempted, Sucart and Gomez have failed to meet the high standard required for the issuance of the extraordinary writ. We therefore deny the petitions.
In the lawsuit below, the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball alleged that eight defendants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nader v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Board of Trustees v. American Educational Enterprises, LLCSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Damsky & Damsky v. University of Miami and Livingstone, M.D.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- State v. FoleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- SCOTT THOMAS v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Victor Manuel Rocha v. Ofelia Acevedo Paya, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026