Heintz v. Akbar
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.
Defendants, J. U. Akbar, M.D., and Pigeon Clinic, P.C., appeal as of right from a jury award of $85,000 to plaintiffs, Mary Margaret Heintz and Michael Heintz. For ease of discussion, we will refer only to plaintiff Mary Margaret Heintz and to defendant Dr. Akbar.
Plaintiff alleged that Dr. Akbar, an employee of the Pigeon Clinic, committed medical malpractice in performing a midline episiotomy on her during the delivery of her first child. A midline episio-tomy is a surgical procedure in which an angular cut is made between the vaginal opening and the rectal opening to facilitate childbirth.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Wilson v. StilwillMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Casualty Co. v. CostelloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Paul v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- De Voe v. C. A. Hull, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hoffman v. Spartan Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Barnett v. HidalgoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.