Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Spartan Stores, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1992No. Docket 121235PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In Hoffman v Monroe Public Schools, 96 Mich App 256, 261; 292 NW2d 542 (1980), this Court held

*291that in all cases, whether civil dr criminal, once a jury has been polled and discharged, its members may not challenge mistakes or misconduct inherent in the verdict. After that point, oral testimony or affidavits by the jurors may only be received on extraneous or outside errors (such as undue influence by outside parties), or to correct clerical errors or matters of form.

Today, we reaffirm the above holding. We will not reward counsel’s postdischarge inquiries regarding the internal thought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. Brown City Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Hoffman v. Monroe Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Brillhart v. MullinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Heintz v. AkbarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Carlos JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Put v. Fki Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Torrez v. McKeeDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Hoffman v. Spartan Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People of Michigan v. Charles Edward HornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API