Legal Opinion
Schulz v. New York State Executive
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 17, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mercure, J.
In July 1996, the Legislature passed Laws of 1996 (ch 412), which authorized the State to incur indebtedness not exceeding $1.75 billion for the purpose of preserving the environment. That law, known as the "Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act of 1996” (L 1996, ch 412, § 1; hereinafter the Bond Act), was signed by respondent Governor and approved by the voters at the November 1996 general election. The stated "single purpose” of the Bond Act was: "preserving, enhancing, restoring, and improving the quality of the state’s environment by the accomplishment of projects…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Boryszewski v. BrydgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Schulz v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wein v. Comptroller of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schulz v. New York State LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Schulz v. New York State ExecutiveNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Schulz v. New York State LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Schulz v. New York State LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001