MATTER OF SCHULZ v. State
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bellacosa, J.
In these cases, a group of citizens challenges State financing schemes embodied in chapter 190 (Schulz Appeal No. 1) and chapter 220 (Schulz Appeal No. 2) of the Laws of 1990. The lawsuits have failed up to now for lack of threshold standing to sue. Appellants advance several theories to support their standing to sue on discrete aspects of the lawsuits, and argue on the merits that the various public financing statutes violate provisions of the New York State Constitution pertaining to how the State may incur debt. We conclude that the appellants in Schulz…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Boryszewski v. BrydgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Estate of BarabashNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Newell v. People Ex Rel. PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Flushing National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell & RossNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rudder v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Schulz v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rentschler v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.