Legal Opinion
Boryszewski v. Brydges
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1975PublishedCited by 177 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We hold today that a taxpayer has standing to challenge enactments of our State Legislature as contrary to the mandates of our State Constitution. Recognizing such procedural right we proceed on the present broad motion to dismiss to consider the sufficiency of the particular claims of unconstitutionality urged here by these petitioners. In so doing, we reject their contentions that the State’s legislative *363and executive retirement plan is unconstitutional and we dismiss their assertions with respect to the unconstitutionality of budget statutes providing lump sum "lulus” in lieu of expenses…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Overhill Building Co. v. DelanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Jerry v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Birnbaum v. New York State Teachers Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Press v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Transactive Corp. v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.