Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Whittaker

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGavegan, J.

This motion to vacate a notice for the examination before trial of a party to a separation action as to the general issues is granted. I do not believe that the practice in the first department permits an examination of such scope in a matrimonial action. Reynolds v. Reynolds (81 Misc. 362) indicated a practice in cases of this kind which was subsequently limited and to a large extent *641barred as a result of decisions in our Appellate Division. In support of the notice respondent relies upon Hofmann v. Hofmann (203 App. Div. 115), a separation action. There the examination Was disallowed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wessel v. SchwarzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Goldberg v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Gullette v. FieldNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gullette v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jasne v. JasneNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API