Legal Opinion
Esparza v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1967No. Civ. 31738PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
—Petitioner appeals from an order denying arbitration under an automobile liability policy containing the uninsured motorist indorsement required by section 11580.2, Insurance Code.
The policy was issued to Clotilda Lechuga as owner, and covered a 1965 Volkswagen. On April 2, 1966, petitioner, appellant herein, was a passenger in the vehicle which was then being operated by one Ernstrom with its owner’s consent. The petition alleged that during the course of such operation “a certain red car, travelling in the same direction on the same road, made a sudden lane change” which forced the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Jordan v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Page v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Felner v. Meritplan Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Lofberg v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.