Legal Opinion

People v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan J.), dated April 4, 2012, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level two sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where “there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006]; see People v Wyatt, 89…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. BussieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. MondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. PadroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WorthamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. NunezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API