Legal Opinion
People v. Wortham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 9, 2014No. 2011-10032PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), dated October 26, 2011, as, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
A defendant seeking a downward departure from the presumptive risk level has the initial burden of “(1) identifying, as a matter of law, an appropriate mitigating factor, namely, a factor which tends to establish a lower likelihood of reoffense or danger to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RoldanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. WiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. RukasovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. HoustonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. GelinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.