Frisvold v. Leahy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal upon the judgment roll from a final judgment rendered after order sustaining a general and special demurrer interposed to the complaint by defendant Leahy. Plaintiff declined leave to amend. The action is one to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon the plaintiff, through collision with a concrete pier, while riding on a public highway in an automobile driven by defendant.
The averring portions of the two counts pertinent to the questions involved herein are as follows: “That heretofore, to-wit: on the 16th day of April,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Provins v. BevisWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Hodge v. BordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Ades v. BrushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Borstad v. La RoqueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.