Legal Opinion

Cherokee Investment Co. v. Voiles

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 15, 1968No. 23358PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

Cherokee Investment Company brings this writ of error directed to a judgment entered against it by the 'District Court of Arapahoe County for breach of an implied warranty in the sale of a water conditioner to defendants in error. Plaintiff in error will hereafter be referred to as Cherokee and defendants in error, Roy E. Voiles and Mae Voiles, will be referred to as plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs sued Cherokee, the dealer, and Hydro-Matic Corporation, the manufacturer, for damages for breach of express and implied warranties, alleging that a water conditioner purchased from Cherokee was defective.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Anderson-Weber, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. General Motors Corporation v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  4. French v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Sutter v. St. Clair Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Taterka v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
  5. Richard O'Brien Companies v. Challenge-Cook Bros.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API