Legal Opinion
Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 13, 2002No. CIV.98-B-1302, CIV.98-B-1884, CIV.98-B-2118, CIV.98-B-227, CIV.98-B-345, CIV.98-B-488, CIV.00-B-388PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
In this diversity action Plaintiffs bring suit in seven consolidated cases under Colorado state law against Defendants Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) and Chiles Power Supply d/b/a Heatway Radiant Floors and Snowmelting (“Heatway”). Goodyear and Heatway bring cross-claims against each other. Goodyear moves for summary judgment on all claims against it. The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument would not materially aid its resolution. For the following reasons, I grant Goodyear’s motion for summary judgment in part and…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- DREAM FINDERS HOMES LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and DFH Mandarin, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and v. WEYERHAEUSER NR COMPANY, a Washington corporation, and Cross-Appellee.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Kadingo v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.