Sutter v. St. Clair Motors, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, JUSTICE.
In this suit, the purchaser of a new automobile seeks to recover the purchase price thereof from the dealer. The plaintiff claims that the automobile was so defective that it was unfit to use, and he therefore should have his money back. The case comes to us on the pleadings.
The plaintiff alleges in his Amended Complaint that on October 17, 1957 he purchased a new Edsel automobile from the defendant dealer for the sum of $3,633.95. He states that he is a farmer, and that the car was bought for business and pleasure. He goes on to allege that the automobile was so imperfect…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Appleman v. Fabert Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Levin v. SiverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Barnett v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Aschtgen v. RaffleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tassan v. United Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Gable v. SilverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Overland Bond & Investment Corp. v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Kel-Keef Enterprises, Inc. v. Quality Components Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Ahern v. KnechtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.