Bailey v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
Movant Donald Bailey appeals denial of Rule 27.26 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant sought relief from sentences after pleas of guilty to charges of burglary first degree, a Class “B” felony, burglary second degree, a Class “C” felony, and stealing over $150, a Class “C” felony. The only claim of error is that movant’s guilty pleas were involuntary and coerced due to his trial attorney’s failure to investigate the case and contact alibi witnesses. We affirm.
Pursuant to a plea bargain arrangement movant offered his pleas of guilty and the state…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sanders v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cathy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Milligan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Stith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bagby v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.