Legal Opinion

Cathy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1982No. 45802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

To be entitled to an evidentiary hearing, movant must plead facts, not conclusions, which if true would entitle him to relief. Jackson v. State, 585 S.W.2d 495, 497 (Mo. banc 1979). An evidentiary hearing may be denied if it can be determined from the files, transcripts, and records that, as a matter of law, a movant is not entitled to relief. Toler v. State, 542 S.W.2d 80, 85 (Mo.App.1976).

Here, the record reveals that movant was charged with burglary in the second degree and stealing. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Toler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Ragan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Bailey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Clark v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Choate v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Mensah v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API