Southeastern Erection Co. v. Flagler Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ebbrhardt, Judge.
This case raises the issue of whether a codefendant in a tort action has standing to oppose a motion for 'summary judgment made by the other codefendant. It is urged that the other codefendant is not, relative to that proceeding, an adverse party, but we do not think that a fair interpretation of the Act. The Summary Judgment Act (Code Ann. § 110-1201, et seq.) specifically makes reference to the “party opposing the motion” but nowhere defines that party as being either a plaintiff or defendant. Nor does the provision for review of an order granting the motion (Code Ann. §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cox v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Moore v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Townsend & Bros. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Finnocchio v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Lewis Card & Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Robinson v. Franwylie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Goldhill v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.