Koehly v. Levi
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jesse Koehly appeals the district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation hearing officer’s order suspending his driving privileges for 180 days. Koehly argues the implied consent law as to breath tests violates the state and federal constitutions, he cured his refusal, and the police officers violated his limited right to counsel. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In July 2015, a Dickinson police officer arrested Koehly for driving while intoxicated. At the police station, the officer placed him in a recorded holding room with his cell phone, and he was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Crawford v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Gwinner v. VincentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Lies v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Marman v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.