Legal Opinion
State v. Helm
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 2017No. 20170036PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McEvers, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from an order granting Steven Helm’s motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution against him for refusing to submit to a warrantless urine test incident to arrest. We conclude the State may not criminally prosecute Helm for refusing to submit to the warrantless urine test incident to arrest, and we affirm the order.
I
[¶ 2] At 1:30 a.m. on May 5, 2016, a law enforcement officer observed Helm driving a motor vehicle without headlights. After interaction with Helm during a traffic stop, the officer suspected Helm was driving under the influence of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. VigenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. NiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. VetterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- City of Fargo v. HoferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Jamestown v. CasarezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.