Legal Opinion

City of Lafayette v. James

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1883No. 9600PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

This action was instituted in the court below by the city of Lafayette against James, as the principal, and the other appellees, as sureties, upon a bond. A demurrer by appellees, except James and McCarthy, was sustained to the first paragraph of the complaint. A motion for a new trial by the city was overruled, and judgment was rendered in favor of the city against James, and against the city in favor of the other appellees. Proper exceptions were taken by the city, and the rulings are assigned as error in this court. These assignments may be considered together, as each presents the main…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  3. People of the State of N.Y. v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Markland Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KimmelIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Stull v. HanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Post v. LoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Weir Plow Co. v. WalmsleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. WinchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Greenfield Lumber & Ice Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API