Weir Plow Co. v. Walmsley
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vigo Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZoiiLARS, J.
Appellant bases its action upon a written contract.
Although signed by appellant and the appellees, Walmsley and Carithers, the contract upon its face shows that the real contracting parties were appellant and Walmsley.
The terms of the contract, so far as they need to be here set out, are, that appellant agreed to “ manufacture and furnish” farming implements to Walmsley, to be sold by him on commission, the kind of implements, the price of the same, and the commission to be allowed to Walmsley being stated. “ Said goods to be delivered on board cars at Indianapolis, *244■on or about, when…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Elkhart Mutual Aid, Benevolent & Relief Ass'n v. HoughtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Freeze v. DePuyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Markland Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KimmelIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Board of Commissioners v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Greenfield Lumber & Ice Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Reinhold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Bostwick v. BryantIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.