University of Connecticut Chapter v. Governor
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The principal issue on this appeal is the constitutionality of General Statutes § 4-85 (b)1 which permits the governor to reduce budgetary allotments by up to 5 percent under certain specified circumstances. The plaintiff unions, claiming that § 4-85 (b) is unconstitutional, originally filed this action in the Superior Court on February 27,1980, to enjoin the governor from making such reductions. The trial court, Satter, J., rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments, found § 4-85 (b) constitutional, and rendered judgment for the defendants. On appeal the plaintiffs argue that General Statutes § 4-85…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Doe v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.