Legal Opinion
Smith v. Robson
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided June 26, 2001No. Civil No. 286/96PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodge, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(June 26, 2001)
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Motion for Sanctions. Defendants seek summary judgment in their favor, arguing that the Plaintiff is not the real party in interest, that the Statute of Frauds bars the action, and that there are no issues as to any material facts in this case. Because the Court is satisfied that issues remain as to material facts, and for the reasons set forth more fully below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied.
FACTS
Plaintiff Daniel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Robert Bower v. Terrence O'hara, Doris Sparks and Sparks Caribbean Investment, Inc. Appeal of Doris Sparks, Appeal of Terrence O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Fountain Valley Corp. v. WellsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
- Cooper v. Vitraco, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Virgin Islands Government Hospitals & Health Facilities Corp. v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Department of HealthSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- Yusuf v. Hamed ex rel. HamedSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Hamed v. YusufSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013