Pure Oil Co. v. Shlifer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadteeld, J.,
This appeal is from the action of the lower court in granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment n. o. v. The facts (agreed upon by counsel for both parties as per agreement filed) are as follows: Plaintiff brought suit against the defendant upon a written guaranty or suretyship dated May 24, 1928, signed by the defendant, who, prior to that date, was president of the Intercity Oil Company, a corporation engaged in the sale of gasoline, oil, and petroleum products. On or about April 1, 1928, the stockholders of the Intercity Oil Company and the National Speedway Befining…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Hempfield Township School District v. CavalierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Warner Gear Co. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Hay v. HillegassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Bank v. AxlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Garden State Tanning, Inc. v. Mitchell Mfg. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. American Employers Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Garden State Tanning, Inc. v. Mitchell Manufacturing Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. R.W. Lutz Electrical Contractor Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1989