Warner Gear Co. v. Bergdoll
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 368, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1913, No. 3215, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Warner Gear Company v. Louis J. Bergdoll. Assumpsit upon a contract of suretyship.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 368, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1913, No. 3215, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Warner Gear Company v. Louis J. Bergdoll. Assumpsit upon a contract of suretyship. The facts appear in the following opinion by Audenried, P. J.: This action was brought against the defendant as guarantor of the payments called for under six contracts between the plaintiff and the Louis J. Bergdoll Company, of which corporation, at the time when these contracts were made, he was the president. The contracts provided for the supply by the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below denying the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Thommen v. Aldine Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Schaffran v. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- In re the Probate of the Alleged Will of MarinusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Tillotson & Wolcott Co. v. Scottdale MacHine & Mfg. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Scranton School District v. Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.