Legal Opinion
Garden State Tanning, Inc. v. Mitchell Manufacturing Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 26, 2001No. 00-2432UnknownCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity case arising under Pennsylvania law, defendant Mitchell Corporation of Owosso (“Owosso”) appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict based on a guaranty for payment of goods furnished to its subsidiary. Owosso argues that the guaranty was abrogated when the subsidiary was sold to another corporation. We will affirm.
Owosso has been involved in the production of interior automotive trim for many years. In 1996, the company created a subsidiary called “Mitchell Manufacturing Group, Inc.,” whose function was to process leather for use by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Aardvark Associates, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America, Aardvark Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ram Construction Company, Inc., Debtor v. American States Insurance Company. American States Insurance Company v. Ram Construction Company, Inc. And Equibank. Appeal of American States Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Meeting House Lane, Ltd. v. MelsoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Continental Bank v. AxlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garden State Tanning, Inc. v. Mitchell Mfg. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001