General Electric Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
The Environmental Protection Agency fined the General Electric Company $25,000 after concluding that it had processed poly-chlorinated biphenyls in a manner not authorized under EPA’s interpretation of its regulations. We conclude that EPA’s interpretation of those regulations is permissible, but because the regulations did not provide GE with fair warning of the agency’s interpretation, we vacate the finding of liability and set aside the fine.
I
GE’s Apparatus Service Shop in Cham-blee, Georgia decommissioned large electric transformers. Inside these transformers was a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rollins Environmental Services (Nj) Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- NetworkIP, LLC v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Paralyzed Veterans of America, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. D.C. Arena L.P., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., Sentry Title Company, Inc., Alan D. Whatley, and Thelma J. WhatleyTexas Supreme Court · 2005
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.