Legal Opinion
Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 5, 2011No. F061287PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEVY, Acting P. J.
In this original proceeding, and the two companion proceedings (Happy Valley Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Com. (July 5, 2011, F061259) [nonpub. opn.]; Calaveras Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Com. (July 5, 2011, F061306) [nonpub. opn.]), 11 rural telephone companies challenge California's Public Utilities Commission (Commission) decision No. 10-06-029, as modified by decision No. 10-10-036 (Decision). The Decision allocates the proceeds from the redemption of Rural Telephone Bank (RTB) stock to the telephone companies’ ratepayers. The subject stock was issued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- San Pablo Bay Pipeline Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- San Pablo Bay Pipeline Co. LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ponderosa Tel. Co. v. Cal. Pub. Utilities Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Branch Banking & Trust v. PUC CA5California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bullseye Telecom, Inc. v. Cal. P.U.C.California Court of Appeal · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.