State v. Mercer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.
This appeal requires us to decide whether Ballot Measure 73 (2010),1 which created enhanced penalties for some repeat sex offenders and intoxicated drivers, was submitted to the voters for their approval in violation of the single-subject requirement of Article IV, section l(2)(d),2 of the Oregon Constitution. We conclude that it was not.
The issue comes to us by way of a criminal appeal. Defendant was charged with, and convicted of, driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII).3 Because defendant *137already had two DUII convictions, the offense was treated as a Class C felony under section…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. FugateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Lovejoy v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Carey-MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. McMullinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Anantha v. ClarnoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State ex rel. Smith v. HittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. EppsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015