Legal Opinion

State v. McMullin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 2015No. CR1200400; A153684PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtL Age Sen, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of 10 counts of rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, two counts of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, and 10 counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427. On appeal, defendant assigns error to, among other things, the trial court’s denial of his motion to exclude a videotaped interview of the child victim conducted at the Children’s Center and its imposition of a sentence pursuant to Ballot Measure 73 (2010) on two of the counts against him. We affirm.

With respect to his first assignment of error,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Purcell v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. RasconCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. ClarkeDeschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. ZavalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. HoltWasco County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API