Legal Opinion
Anantha v. Clarno
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 12, 2020No. A172786PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
196 Argued and submitted February 4, reversed and remanded February 12, 2020 Vikram ANANTHA and Micha Gross, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Beverly CLARNO, Oregon Secretary of State, Defendant-Respondent. Marion County Circuit Court 19CV44301; A172786
461 P3d 282
Seeking to amend the Oregon Forest Practices Act, ORS 527.610 to 527.770; ORS 527.990(1); ORS 527.992, and related statutory provisions, plaintiffs pro- posed three initiative petitions for the November 3, 2020, general election. The Oregon Secretary of State rejected each proposed measure, concluding that each initiative petition violated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Lovejoy v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Eastman v. Jennings-McRae Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mason v. Griffin-ValadeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Mason v. Griffin-ValadeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Xcaliber Int. LTD, LLC v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026