Legal Opinion
Weil v. N. J. Richman Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
This is an action for an injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing and selling tablecloths, the design of which, it is alleged, infringes a design letters patent issued to one John S. Madson, and assigned to plaintiffs.
The defendant’s notice of motion recites that it is moving herein pursuant to Rule 12(b), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the ground that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. I am satisfied that defendant’s motion is really for summary judgment, under Rule 56(b), F.R.C.P. As a matter of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York Belting & Packing Co. v. New Jersey Car Spring & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dubilier Condenser Corporation v. New York Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Jacob Elishewitz & Sons Co. v. Bronston Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Frank v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1942
- American Optical Co. v. New Jersey Optical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
- In re Watauga Steam LaundryDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1947
- Messing v. Quiltmaster CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- Staffin Lewis Corp. v. Rose Derry Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.