Legal Opinion
Staffin Lewis Corp. v. Rose Derry Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 27, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 7576PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCARTHY, District Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment by the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. The plaintiff in this action is seeking injunctive relief, a declaratory judgment, and an accounting. It wishes to establish that it has not and is not infringing Rose Patent No. 2,106,065 for a mattress, granted January 18, 1938, and that the Rose patent is invalid and void. The complaint also included a count for unfair competition. The defendant counterclaimed to allege infringement of the Rose patent and thereafter amended its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peckham v. Ronrico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Stilz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- American Optical Co. v. New Jersey Optical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
- Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1973
- Kollsman Instrument Corp. v. Astek Instrument Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- B & S Screw Products Co. v. Cleveland Metal Stamping Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Meyer Lumber & Hardware Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1951