Dubilier Condenser Corporation v. New York Coil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
We pass the question whether, when suit is brought upon two patents in one bill, the earlier may be taken as an anticipation of the later. For the sake of argument we shall assume that this is permissible. Nevertheless we think that the issue of invalidity is not so clear in the case at bar as to deprive the plaintiff of any opportunity to try its case.
The structure of the two condensers is concededly in some respects different. The terminals of Van Deventer are the tubular rivet and the lug in contact with the outer easing. Those of Dubilier are the two tubular rivets…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Bonnie-B Co. v. GiguetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- Scott & Williams, Inc. v. Aristo Hosiery Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
3Cited by18 opinions
- Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- White v. Leanore Frocks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis Janitor Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Trane Co. v. Nash Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.