Legal Opinion

Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 20, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

I think it is too clear even for argument that such a case as this cannot be disposed of on motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The issues involve the validity and alleged infringement of two unadjudicated patents, and such questions can only be adequately determined after a trial.

The motion for summary judgment is denied.

2Cases cited1 opinion

Kelleher v. Cohoes Trucking Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

Kollsman Instrument Corp. v. Astek Instrument Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1942
Weil v. N. J. Richman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
Murphy v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
S. R. Leon, Inc. v. Parfums Schiaparelli, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.