Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Collingsworth
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Collingsworth, a switch oiler, while engaged as ■ such, at about 7:30 p. m., October 15, 1926, in the ■yards of appellant, was run down and injured by the front of a cut of 11 or 12 box ears being shoved by an engine moving backwardly. He brought this suit to recover for the damages inflicted. Appellant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied and the court, clarifying the averments of the petition, submitted the ease to the jury upon two allegations of negligence: First, that “the train was moving ■ eastwardly without having a watchman or lookout on the leading car,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. KoskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sinram v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Martin v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Kurn v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Finley v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.