Legal Opinion

Boldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1918No. 62PublishedCited by 165 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

At Buffalo, New York, defendant has a yard where freight trains are made up. Cars under control of a brakeman descend by gravity to desired positions on connecting tracks which lie southward of the “hump” or high point. A rule forbade employees from going between cars without first taking precautions not observed in the present case. Some evidence tended to show that under long-continued practice, considered good railroading, cars (in “strings” or “cuts”) were constantly sent down and purposely allowed to strike others with sufficient force to secure coupling, but not hard enough to injure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Erie Railroad v. PuruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Joice v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API