Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fitas v. Milwaukee County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1974No. State 54PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

This original action was brought to determine which branch of the government is required to appoint and compensate counsel required in administrative proceedings for the revocation of probation and parole. We conclude that, until such time as additional legislation may be adopted or until further order of the court, the public defender shall represent all indigent persons against whom proceedings for the revocation of probation or parole have been commenced in those instances where there has been an administrative determination that counsel is required.

Jay P. Fitas, the petitioner herein, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ronge v. DawsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  5. State Ex Rel. Cresci v. H&SS DEPARTMENTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Douglas County v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Norwood v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. WolvertonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API