Ronge v. Dawson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR TO circuit COURT, DANE COUNT?. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Dixon, C. J.
This is an action of replevin, commenced before the adoption of the code, by the intestate of the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, in the circuit court for the county of Dane, to recover the possession of a mare colt, alleged to have been the property of the intestate, and damages for the unjust taking and detention. The declaration is in the cepit, and charges that the plaintiff in error wrongfully and unjustly took and detained the colt against *247sureties and pledges, until, &c. To it the plaintiff in error pleaded: 1. The general issue denying that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Badger v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Patterson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Thompson v. ButtonNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Bemus v. BeekmanCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
- Hanna v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. DuboseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Pickens v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.