Legal Opinion

United States v. Grant

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 20, 1964No. 17,779Published

1Opinion of the Court

The record reflects the court-martial was informed, during pre-sentence proceedings, that the suspension of a term of confinement imposed against accused on a prior conviction, had thereafter been vacated. See United States v Kiger, 13 USCMA 522, 33 CMR 54.

The decision of the Board of Review as to sentence is reversed, and the case is remanded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for return to the Board of Review for reassessment of the sentence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. KigerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963