Legal Opinion

Ambrose-Augusterfer Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 10, 1968No. 377-63PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKELTON, Judge.

The plaintiff, on behalf of its subcontractor, seeks an equitable price adjustment under a contract with the General Services Administration (GSA) for the installation of a central air-conditioning system and, alternatively, damages for breach of that contract. 1 More specifically, on March 23, 1960, the defendant through the GSA awarded plaintiff a fixed-price contract in the amount of $2,389,000. The contractual scope of work included “the furnishing of all labor and materials and performing all work required for the alterations, additions, repairs, and miscellaneous changes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Merrill-Ruckgaber Company v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Sundstrand Turbo, a Division of Sundstrand Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. General Builders Supply Co., Inc., on Behalf of Itself and for the Benefit of Hupp, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. H. N. Bailey & Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  5. Petrochem Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API