Legal Opinion

United States v. Hubbard

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 10, 1989No. 50,491; CM 443159PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officers tried Hubbard at Fort Shatter, Hawaii, on charges that he had murdered, sodomized, and committed indecent acts with a child under 16 years of age, in violation of Articles 118, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 918, 925, and 934, respectively. The murder was alleged in separate specifications as both premeditated murder and felony-murder committed in the perpetration of sodomy.

Hubbard pleaded not guilty to all the charges; but he was convicted of unpremeditated murder; felony murder;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  4. United States v. MobleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. LewisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API